(Question 1: What was the biggest surprise for you in the
reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different
from your expectations?)
I am actually amazed at the
multiple view points and approaches to entrepreneurialism outlined in the
reading. I have heard of many people in
my career being called entrepreneurial or as being entrepreneurs. It became a widely over utilized term like “business
analyst” and so it had almost no meaning to me any more. I was somewhat shocked that there is both a
philosophical and economical viewpoint on the term and am very interested to
continue the readings.
(Question 2: Identify at least one part of the reading that was
confusing to you.)
I’m still somewhat unclear
as to the difference between a small business owner and an entrepreneur as
defined by the book. Based on the reading:
“Small businesses are
independently owned and operated, are not dominant in their fields, and usually
do not engage in many new or innovative practices. They may never grow large,
and the owners may prefer a more stable and less aggressive approach to running
these businesses; in other words, they manage their businesses by expecting stable
sales, profits, and growth.”
“On the other hand,
entrepreneurial ventures are those for which the entrepreneur’s principal
objectives are innovation, profitability, and growth.”
Based on those two
statements it seems that there are some defining characteristics; such as
aggression of growth and acceptance of risk and profits. However, then the book goes on to say:
Entrepreneurship is the
dynamic process of creating incremental wealth. This wealth is created by
individuals who assume the major risks in terms of equity, time, and/or career
commitment of providing value for some product or service. The product or
service itself may or may not be new or unique but value must somehow be
infused by the entrepreneur by securing and allocating the necessary skills and
resources.
Which seems much more
similar to the description provided of a small business owner.
(Question 4: Was there anything you think the author was wrong
about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?)
I would suggest an edit
here to draw in the idea that; while not all small business owners are entrepreneurs,
a portion of small business owners did take major security and financial risks
to fill a market gap; relative to their starting position.
(Question 3: If you were able to ask two questions to the
author, what would you ask? Why?)
Based on the definition of
an entrepreneur; which includes risk taking, aggressive profitability and growth,
I wonder if the author would call to much; or undertrained entrepreneurs a risk
to the financial enterprise. Considering
the recent market crashes (mortgage crisis and dot com) were both brought on by
every sense of the word entrepreneur; except of course the word sustainability.
Similarly, should entrepreneurs be held to a higher level of accountability in
society due to the risks that they endeavor on?
I’m thinking here of the MBA Oath written and signed by Harvard business
students in 2009 following the mortgage crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment