What was the biggest
surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood
out the most as different from your expectations?
I actually loved the
section on Valuation Methods. I thought
that the table 14.3 was very illustrative of the different methods and their
key takeaway for future valuations.
Identify at least one part
of the reading that was confusing to you.
In the “analyzing the
business” section (pg. 511) the author talks about some of the different
pitfalls that a small company must take into consideration over and above what
a large company would. Perhaps this is
my emotional bias (or perhaps I’ve worked at enough ‘large’ companies) but the
four examples that were provided were extremely qualitative in my opinion. There was little substance to them and to be
honest in some examples (like Management Depth) I’m not sure that there is a
straight line advantage between simply having MORE degrees of skills.
If you were able to ask
two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
Still no questions; tis
week 13 now and not one comment back to me answering a question that I’ve
had. Nor any acknowledgement of the fact
that I’m protesting this portion of the assignment. This will be in my final reflection as a gap
in the class. Don’t ask me to ask
questions if no one ever intends to respond.
Was there anything you
think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said?
How?
Going back to the
confusion I had on Analyzing the business I have to say that I think the author
is flat out wrong in this section. I’ll
take the example of insufficient controls that was illustrated as a limitation
of a small business. However, that is not inherent as a concern; many small
business ventures that then grow rapidly were built along a mission of
control. Look at the rise of Facebook;
part of their rapid growth and loyal fan base was because of the controls that
Zuckerberg put in place at the beginning. Not to mention the other side of the coin;
looking at mortgage servicing companies like Washington Mutual, Country Wide
and even JP Morgan Chase that had plenty of capital and depth of management and
yet still lacked the appropriate controls (negligently so) causing a financial
collapse in 2008. Compare a smaller
airline in Southwest versus American or United and how their size and controls
allowed them to be financially stable for more than 50 years as opposed to
their larger peer groups that are consistently bankrupt and under profit.
No comments:
Post a Comment